Attributing a human faculty name ('intelligence') to a computational system imports an evaluation frame in which human worth is measured by efficiency; the summary frames this as a risk that human dignity ends up judged 'solely by efficiency'. Engineering analogue: once a system is named after a human faculty, the default evaluation set collapses to a single proxy dimension (throughput, task accuracy, cost) and other dimensions silently disappear from the harness.
Evaluation harnesses that inherit a single dominant proxy dimension (efficiency) will not detect regressions on dimensions nobody instrumented; the failure is invisible until it is a product or safety incident.
Whenever a system is named after the human capability it approximates, teams should expect single-metric evaluation capture and should deliberately maintain a multi-dimensional eval suite that includes non-efficiency criteria.
When intelligence is attributed to computational systems, human dignity risks being judged solely by efficiency.