When AI code generation becomes cheap, delivery speed starts being gated by deciding what to build and specifying it clearly, not by writing code. That is why the engineer-to-PM ratio is trending down to 2:1 or even 1:1; engineers who go talk to users and run feedback loops move fastest.
It redirects engineering effort from implementation speed to product discovery and requirement formalization; an AI-native development workflow should be instrumented around feedback and spec changes, not only generated code.
Any technology that drastically lowers unit production cost moves the bottleneck upstream to demand and specification; teams need design and discovery loops rather than more producers.
As coding becomes faster and cheaper through AI, the bottleneck shifts from writing code to deciding what to build and writing clear product specs.
The engineering-to-PM ratio is trending downward toward 2:1 or even 1:1.
Engineers who can talk to users, get feedback, and shape products move the fastest.